What is the nature of a contract made by a person who is intoxicated enough to be uncertain of its consequences?

A contract made by a person who is intoxicated to the point of being uncertain about its consequences is generally considered voidable. This means that the intoxicated party has the right to affirm or reject the contract once they regain their capacity. The rationale behind this principle is that intoxication can impair a person's ability to understand the legal significance of their actions, and the law seeks to protect individuals from entering into binding agreements when they are not fully capable of making informed decisions.

In situations where a person is intoxicated, if the intoxication is severe enough to affect their judgment, they can choose to void the contract upon regaining sobriety, thus providing a mechanism for relief. This distinguishes it from a void contract, which is not valid from the outset, or an enforceable contract, which would be valid regardless of the party's state at the time of agreement. Additionally, a breaching party refers to a situation where one party fails to meet their contractual obligations, rather than addressing the capacity to enter into a contract in the first place.